Back to Timeline
Avatar
unidentified

Непонятная методика, но мне нравится постановка вопроса

Quality of life, percentile • better - America's Most Livable Cities On the local median salary, after taxes, rent and living costs Northeast West Coast & Hawaii Midwest • Mountain West & Alaska South BEST VALUE High quality, low cost 100 - PREMIUM LIFE Expensive, but worth it MEDIAN PAY DOESN'T COVER IT + Buffalo San Diego Columbus Charlotte Sacramento •Honolulu Oklahoma City Boston Madison 80 maha Portland Kansas City Boise Nashville San Jose - Tampa 60 Cincinnati Raleigh Dallas -Seattle Orlando Richmond Austin Jacksonville Pittsburgh 40 20 Minneapolis Oakland Cleveland San Antonio Tucsor Anchorage Indianapolis Saint Louis Washington DC Milwaukee Denver Atlanta Salt Lake City New Orleans Albuquerque Baltimore San Francisco Philade phia Miami New York Houston Las Vegas Phoen! Chicago Los Angeles Detroit Cheap, but not as comfortable BUDGET LIVING High cost, low quality BAD VALUE 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% Rent + living costs, share of median take-home pay → Take-home pay = BLS median wage for the metro area (May 2025), minus federal, state and city income tax, FICA and state payroll deductions (2026 rules, single). Costs = Numbeo, one person + one-bed outside the centre, Oct 2026. Quality of life = Numbeo formula without price terms, percentile among 51 US cities. Dashed lines: median city. @thealepalombo
👍5
  1 comment
Comments (1)
Avatar Michael Yatsko

Более-менее правда. В Детройте жить копейки стоит, но лучше не надо. LA - понты голые за сотни денег. Нью-Йорк - еще дороже и еще понтовее. Остин - дешево и хорошо. Пока туда не наползло из ЛА и Нью-Йорка черномазого левачья.